Does this image make you feel panicky?
It's a poster for Evergreen, a Canadian nonprofit that promotes "deepening the connection between people and nature." Sounds like a good cause to me; I'd like my city to be as full of trees, lakes, streams, birds, and (nonviolent) animals as it can possibly be. Even though I don't live in Canada.
(You can see other posters in the series here and here.)
But really now. This poster is hardly takes you where the organization wants you to go. Here's what it says:
Be the Root
Nature in the city begins with all of us. The harder we try, the more it will thrive. We need your help. Visit evergreen.ca
First the headline: Be the Root. I think that's pretty good. It really could have gone somewhere -- to a call to action like giving or volunteering. But it doesn't. It falls apart with the confusing, misdirecting copy, which can't seem to make up its mind us "we" are -- everybody, or the people at Evergreen? And rather than be clear about what needs to happen, it just has us trying hard ... at, well, something.
But weak copy alone can hardly get you a Stupid Nonprofit Ad honor. And in this case, the winning ingredient is the insanely weird image.
When I think about being surrounded by nature, I tend to focus on fresh air, clean smells, gentle sounds. Not being buried head down.
Is that a look of deranged happiness on his face? Or is it a frozen mask for horror brought on by this sadistic torture of live, head-down burial with his neck grafted onto a shrub?
This poster is a symptom of the same impulse that drives most of the other Stupid Nonprofit Ads: Abstraction. The cause of naturing up the city sounds pretty straightforward, doesn't it? You'd think that donors' gifts and volunteers' work would translate pretty logically into concrete, understandable progress. Right?
The creative Zen-masters who designed the poster apparently didn't think so, and chose an abstract representation of how you can connect to the cause. Abstract and utterly wacko.
If you want to motivate people to join your cause, you're just going to have to tell them what you want them to do, and why. Be clear and compelling. Nobody who matters is going to laugh at the "obviousness" of your message.
Leave the abstractionism to avant-garde artists. They do it better.
Thanks to AdRants for the tip.
See many more Stupid Nonprofit Ads.
Technorati Tags: fundraising, advertising



I've enjoyed your series on stupid non-profit ads. You frequently mention readability as a Good Thing. Yet, you use a font for your headings that is quite unreadable, e.g. the C looks like an L, the N looks reversed (is it?). And the extremely tight kerning makes it worse. I think maybe you are falling in the "cute and arty" trap yourself. But I love your content (and icons) and think your site performs a great service.
Posted by: Kate D. | 15 May 2009 at 16:23
On the contrary. But perhaps this discussion demonstrates that even in the world of evidence-based communication practice, there is still much room for the subjective response.
Posted by: Frances | 06 May 2009 at 10:10
It does look like something out of Monty Python, and thus diminishes its effectiveness.
Posted by: Jeff Imparato | 04 May 2009 at 12:29
This rant reinforces the theory that "any press is good press." Thanks Frances for visiting our website.
Posted by: Nate | 29 April 2009 at 17:39
I've gotta agree with Jeff on this one. It's beautifully designed and executed, and grabs your attention, but the main message and call to action are weak at best.
Even just a line or two that captures who Evergreen is would be nice. The "crazy folk" imagery makes me think of stereotypical crazy green movement people, not just plain folk like me who care about the environment but maybe aren't putting action to belief.
And if the ONLY purpose is to drive traffic to their website, I'd like to see the quantitative data that shows it's been successful. Anyone at Evergreen care to share?
Posted by: Dan Hutson | 29 April 2009 at 12:05
I have to say something here. Most of the time you are right on, but, ALAS, not this time. I think the abstraction and the wackiness is exactly what's doing the work here--and, no, I don't work for the agency that created it. Besides, we're talking about it, and you picked it up, right?
The image IS weird, but works at the level of dehabituation. The rough paper is part of the overall piece too. Maybe the call isn't as clear as you'd expect but it's really designed to drive traffic to their site, which it does.
Posted by: Frances | 29 April 2009 at 11:39