Maybe you've encountered donation websites that don't take gifts below a certain amount. The purpose, I suppose, is to keep the small-gift riff-raff out.
The Firstgiving Blog looks a this issue upon encountering a site that turned away donations under $25 (!): Every little bit helps for a good cause, doesn't it?
Why would you refuse to accept donations under $25? ... we all know that there are processing fees, but they're a lot more for checks than for online transactions. And processing fees are usually a percentage of the donation -- like Firstgiving's are -- so why would it matter if somebody wanted to give even just one dollar online?
I can think of one good reason you don't want tiny gifts: The vast majority of donors who give very small gifts keep giving very small gifts. Their value to you will remain small, and if you aren't careful, you can end up spending more cultivating them than they'll give you over time.
Someone who gives $1 (or even $5) -- especially online, where the norm is up around $100 -- is likely not a serious donor.
But there's more to it. Many small gifts are "Widow's Mite" gifts -- far more meaningful than their amount indicates. I know I'm in unmeasurable, spiritual territory here, but it's true. Charitable giving is a lot more than just a monetary transaction.
And that's why you should accept tiny gifts. Nothing's forcing you to spend on a $1 donor the way you would on a $50 donor.
Giving people a chance to give is a great service. One of the best you have to offer, really. It's just not right to turn people away from the benefits of giving just because they can't give very much. That's basically a harsh form of discrimination against the poor. Not all the tiny-gift donors are poor; some are just cheap. But we can't tell the difference, can we?
Here's what I'd do: Include the line, "Suggested minimum" (say $5 or $10), but don't enforce it.
Technorati Tag: fundraising
whatever the size or the amount, it's the thought that counts....
Posted by: collectible toys & gifts | 02 October 2008 at 16:45
Well I just started earning and I frankly can't give much but I make it a point that I give only when I genuinely want to. Turning me away seems silly to me because at some point I might be earning more, then I definitely would not be giving to that charity!!
For online communites maybe transacting say a $1 contribution would cost half that amount. I dunno.
Posted by: Priyanka | 01 September 2008 at 05:27
One tiny donor's perspective...
I consider myself a tiny donor - but I only start out that way (think: $10) until I feel "comfortable" with a charity. Being fairly new to having the kind of income that allows me to donate, I'm (perhaps) overly cautious. I do try to find out the most cost-efficient way to give to a particular organization (online, check, cash if it's an option), and then - piggy-backing on your more recent post regarding customer service - increase my level of contribution based on how it's handled. I also choose tiny charities because my $10 is more meaningful to someone raising $20,000 for a project than, say, Unicef with its kazillions of donor dollars.
Posted by: KatieMc | 13 June 2008 at 12:45
Another thing about the "widow's mite", is that some of them will actually be widows. And they'll be cash poor, but potentially asset rich. They care about what you do, they want to give, and give an amount they can afford. One day, they'll potentially leave some of their estate.
I realise this may appear cold, but I suspect THEY might not see it that way. Many of the Little Old Ladies I know are fabulous, have a different way of looking at the world, and are more web savvy than you might expect.
Posted by: Mikemuses | 09 June 2008 at 17:45
Even though the organization must get the average acquisition gift over $15 to $25 (depending upon the analysis of repeat gifts for a given organization) to upgrade donors successfully, why would anyone turn down a gift regardless of the amount? I agree with your statement.
I love your analogy of the "widows mite." Who knows. A potential large donor may be testing the charitable organization to see what they do. Do they appreciate a donor's desire or need to help regardless of amount?
When judging the character of the organization, it is important to reflect a spirit of thankfulness. It's how well we do the little things that end up reflecting who we really are.
So accept the small gifts with open arms and send a heartfelt thank you note. The donor deserves your respect.
Thank you for picking up on this important point Jeff.
Posted by: Ted Grigg | 08 June 2008 at 22:41