« Carnival of Nonprofit Consultants | Main | It's the relevance, not the medium »

Don't use no bad English

The bly.com blog (a copywriting blog) asks an interesting question: Must Copywriters Use Good English?

On the table is this groaner, heard on the radio: "Monthly payments are as low as $300 a month."

Must we use good English? As far as I'm concerned, the short answer is no.

The longer answer is, Good English is preferable but there are other things that are more important. Like:


  • Clarity.
  • Emotion.
  • Sounding natural and making a connection with the reader.

It's possible for these things to come in conflict with "Good English."

Suppose you came up with this sentence: Who can I depend on? It contains one error (it should be "whom") plus one pseudo-error (it ends with a preposition; fussy schoolmarm-types care about that, but it's not really an error). The corrected version would be On whom can I depend? That sounds awkward, pedantic, and excessively formal. Normal people don't talk that way; it simultaneously pulls attention away from the meaning and puts up a barrier between the writer and reader.

I'd take the error-infested version over the correct one any day. Or, perhaps, I'd recast the sentence to avoid the issue entirely and be correct and sound good.

Flat-out errors can make you look stupid -- though I suspect they do a lot less harm than some fear. And using "Good English" signals that you're careful with your thoughts and words. It's also a "class marker" a secret identity badge that shows you're educated, not one of the riffraff.

If you want to motivate people to voluntarily part of with their money on your behalf, your personal pride in your education and parentage of no place in your communications. It's more important to be friendly, passionate, clear than it is to be "correct."

First things first. Good English is second.


Technorati Tags: ,

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b8ab69e200d835464caa53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Don't use no bad English:

Comments

I agree with your analysis.

Absolutely! I know of one E.D. who wouldn't let his staff make a dislay that said "Who we are...Who can help... who we serve." The ED insisted on "good english" and saying "whom we serve." He is right, that's proper grammer, but it breaks the flow and it sounds snooty.

I'm all for effective communication. Know the rules of grammer, and know when to break them!

The comments to this entry are closed.


If you're serious about raising money from donors, you need to get serious about donors. More than ever before, donors are insisting that you share power with them, not treating them like passive ATMs. This blog is about the ways you can do that -- and the rewards that await you and your donors when you do.

Jeff Brooks, creative director at Merkle, has been serving the nonprofit community for nearly 20 years. He wants to be a curmudgeon when he grows up, and considers blogging great training. You can reach him at
<jbrooks [at] merkleinc [dot] com.More
  See this blog's policies.
A great partner for the nonprofit that wants to get donor-powered and grow revenue like crazy!
Subscribe by e-mail

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


AddThis Feed Button

Add to Technorati Favorites